Itâ€™s hard for me to compose a blog post on Good Friday and not write about Jesus. He is, after all, the central figure of the Christian faith, and his execution on a Roman cross is a key part of the central event. In Christian theology, the Crucifixion speaks volumesâ€”innumerable volumesâ€”about the love of God.
Does it have anything to do with dialogue? I think it does speak to dialogue, and the message is strikingly nuanced.
On the one hand, the Jesus of the Gospels waxes eloquent about the ideals behind dialogue. He blesses the peacemakers, commands us to love our enemies, calls for unity among believers, and identifies all these imperatives as a reflection of Godâ€™s very heart.Â We cannot love people most effectively without knowing them, and we cannot know them without listening: deeply, extensively, in the spirit of dialogue.
Then there is the example of Jesus himself. Â His mission, of course, involved delivering a message, so in the Gospels he does a great deal of talking. But he also listens and, I would submit, is changed by the listening. He listens in amazement to a Roman centurion and says, â€œNot even in Israel have I found such faithâ€ (Luke 7:1-9). He listens to a Gentile woman who deftly argues that she too is worthy of his attention (Mark 7:23b-30). He asks his disciples who they think he is (Mark 8:27-30)â€”and I donâ€™t believe itâ€™s a rhetorical question.
That is the one hand.
The other hand brings us much closer to Good Friday itself. It is the end of a life lived not in dialogue with the religious authorities, but in conflict with them. His penetrating and sometimes caustic remarks offend them deeply. They see him as a troublemaker in a time and place where troublemaking could lead to Roman crackdown. And then, one Passover seasonâ€”with thousands of pilgrims turning Jerusalem into a security tinderboxâ€”this Jesus goes into the temple and creates havoc, overthrowing tables and chasing out moneylenders.
Here is what I take from all this. Dialogue is a good, to be sure. More specifically, it is a good to be used when it makes senseâ€”and in service to something else. In Jesusâ€™ case, that â€œsomething elseâ€ involved two higher goods that he practiced throughout his ministry: truth regardless of consequences and love that crosses taboos.
You would think that â€œspeaking the truth in love,â€ as St. Paul puts it (Ephesians 4:15), would be uncontroversial. Not everyone, however, wants the truth to be proclaimed. At times, none of us want the truth to be proclaimed. Similarly, not everyone wants the unlovable to be loved (and we all have our own â€œunlovablesâ€). The simple action of upholding truth and compassion, then, can get you in trouble.
Perhaps that is one good message among many to take from Good Friday. Pursue truth relentlessly. Spread compassion extravagantly. Use dialogue where appropriate to pursue these higher goods and others. Together with the other gifts that the Jesus of the Gospels has given us, this legacy deserves our commitment and our praise.
Thank You John for the refreshing look at Good Friday. Jesus really changes the scripts we are so used to when we dialogue. One the fascinating events of the Good Friday story that I believe states that its time to open up dialogue with both God and each other is the Tearing of the veil in the temple…in so many ways that I believe that is God’s final word on what she thinks of walls…..thanks for using your talents to remind us of the truth of that.
Thank you for the comment, Martha! I’m glad you brought up the torn veil: it spoke to me so powerfully as a young Christian, but over the years I’ve become more focused on other symbols. Maybe it’s time I revisited this as a clear example of Jesus’ (in your good words) “changing the scripts.”