Last night, BBCâ€™s World News America led with yet another story on the suffering in Syria. I was reluctant to watch itâ€”not because I donâ€™t care about that horrendous conflict, but because it was yet another story.
How much news from Syria, or from anywhere, do we need? How much can we take? Is there a point at which we â€œget the pointâ€ and can skip the following stories with impunity? How many of the â€œfollowing storiesâ€?
Letâ€™s start with basic attitudes toward news. For me, the news is required reading/viewing. I try to write with nuance about some difficult and complex issues, and thereâ€™s no way to do that without a great deal of input, both hard news and diverse analysis. For others, news might guide them in how to vote, which charities to support, or where to roll up their sleeves and help out.
My understanding of my faith also plays a role. It tells me that every human being bears the image of God, and that God cares deeply, massively, for those who suffer. So Iâ€™m called to care deeply for them too. The way I can connect with their stories, their situations, is (in part) through the news.
News is everywhere these days. We have 24/7 news stations. A myriad of websites are always available, always telling stories. Some of us throwbacks still get the newspaper every day.
The problem is, the macro-level stories and issues take time to developâ€”usually months or years. So these news media, needing something to fill the space, tell slight variations of the same story from one day to the next.
Itâ€™s a barrage.
And with each dayâ€™s news, the decision comes up againâ€”especially in stories that involve suffering. Watch too many of these, and we risk becoming desensitized. Thereâ€™s a limit to how much we can take. Itâ€™s why a lot of people either check out entirely or (as Iâ€™ve done) go on news fasts.
On the other hand, maybe the next story provides an insight I never had before. Or the story on suffering in Syria tells (as it often does) of this mother in that city who has lost x children in the conflict. If I miss the story, I lose the insight, or I fail to connect with this particular divine image bearer.
Of course, this isnâ€™t just true of news from faraway lands. How many stories about our local homeless folks do we need to hear before the same difficult decisionâ€”to watch or not to watch this segment, on this nightâ€”faces us?
Ultimately, we make the decision story by story, day by day. And I donâ€™t think it gets easier. Have you found a good way to absorb news stories without going to overload? How much news do you need?