Last week in this space, we discussed â€œa time for dialogue and a time to shut up.â€ In line with my contemplative nature, Iâ€™ve opted for the latter recently, sitting in silent prayer with the wreckage of the U.S. presidential election and seeing what bubbles to the surface.
What has bubbled to the surface is impatience.
Iâ€™ve had no use for rehashing the results or joining in the collective fury of many people on the left. I have turned my attention away from analysis, predictions, commentary, and punditry of all types. Weirdest of all, my colleagues are mobilizing for dialogue efforts, and I just canâ€™t join them.
What I do wantâ€”what in fact Iâ€™m cravingâ€”are facts.
I have little interest in what Mr. Trump says at this point, but I want to know what he does. Right now, itâ€™s all about who he appoints to his administration: their qualifications, their temperament. On January 21, itâ€™ll be about the policies he pushes, the executive orders he signs, the treaties he abrogates (or doesnâ€™t). Donâ€™t tell me what it means; donâ€™t tell me what you think about it; just give me the facts.
The other day, I realized that my hunger for â€œjust the factsâ€ is part of something bigger. Itâ€™s a craving for truthâ€”or at the very least, an unblinking pursuit of truth.
Iâ€™m craving truth because Iâ€™ve barely heard any for more than a year now. Mr. Trump has built a history of chronic, continual lying. Secretary Clinton is hardly simon-pure herself. Social media is littered with memes and news stories with next to no truth value. Each side is armed with its own â€œfacts,â€ to which it clings regardless of evidence to the contrary.
But hereâ€™s the thing: dialogueâ€™s value is greatly diminished if we donâ€™t care about truth.
Yes, we can still dialogue to understand one another, to glimpse anotherâ€™s pain and struggles up close, to foster empathy. Thatâ€™s still terribly important. But if the point is to work together on societyâ€™s problemsâ€”what professionals call deliberationâ€”forget it. You canâ€™t agree on what to do if you donâ€™t agree on whatâ€™s happening.
Some people might raise objections at this point. No one can uncover absolute truth (if it even exists). My truth is different from your truth. Whatâ€™s more important is common understanding. Etc. Thereâ€™s merit in these points, to be sure.
But to dismiss the pursuit of truth entirely is wrongheaded. Consider: Gravity exists. Slavery is wrong. Smoking causes cancer. There was a point at which all of these points were not regarded as truth. Now they are. Over the eons, we have learned things about the cosmos, and we assert those things as true, because we have inquired into the truth of the matter.
This pursuit of truth energizes dialogue. Hereâ€™s what I wrote in my book:
The whole point of raising [the commitment to truth in a book on dialogue] is its power to bring us together. When we are passionate about truthâ€”not truth as we see it, but truth in itselfâ€”we eagerly seek out anyone whose perspective might shed light on that truth. That draws us into an exploration of diverse ideas with other people. In other words, truth seeking as a habit of the heart draws us straight into dialogue.
So for now, for me, facts first. Pursuit of truth first. Thereâ€™ll be plenty of time for the essential work of dialogueâ€”later.