Recently, from somewhere in my spiritual practice, this question has arisen and will not let me go. It may be my â€œquestion for 2022,â€ if there is such a thing. In this space, Iâ€™ll share some background to explain what the question means to me and why itâ€™s captured my attention.
First, to restate: What constitutes right action in a failing democracy?
The words failing democracy may have grabbed you, so letâ€™s look at them. The current issue of The Atlantic features several articles on this idea, including Barton Gellmanâ€™s â€œJanuary 6 Was Practiceâ€ (may require sign-in/subscription). Â The essential idea is that officials in the Trump wing of the U.S. Republican Partyâ€”which is now most of the Republican Partyâ€”are laying a more extensive foundation for ensuring that Trump returns to the White House in 2024, even if it means contravening the election results. Because this effort is more extensive and more organized, it is more likely to succeed. Even typically restrained commentators are wondering openly about the death of democracy, hence the failing democracy phrase.
(Itâ€™s worth noting that Gellman wrote a similar piece around mid-2020, forecasting how Trump might react to an electoral loss, and nearly everything he forecast came true.)
I am in no position to speak for Trump devotees, but I wonder whether the phrase failing democracy might resonate with them too. As best I understand it, they are convinced not only that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump, but that we are moving toward socialism and away from democracy. That may qualify for them as failing.
The other bit that may need explanation is right action. Itâ€™s one component of the Noble Eightfold Path, which the Buddha described as the way to extinguish suffering. The commentaries Iâ€™ve read tend to concentrate on the fundamentals of the Buddhaâ€™s idea here: do not take life, do not steal, be honest, refrain from illegitimate sex. (This may sound familiar to my Christian siblings!) For me, the words right action can connote moreâ€”this article on the Noble Eightfold Path asserts that â€œright action aims at promoting moral, honorable, and peaceful conduct.â€ Part of our job, as I understand it, is to explore what that might mean in specific situations, like the situation of living in a failing democracy.
There are, of course, many quick and ready answers to this question: protest, write your congressperson, etc. These have never sat well with me. They are good and noble actions, to be sure. But from my perspective, as a response to a failing democracy, they do not address the fundamental truth of our condition as individualsâ€”i.e., the relative smallness of our influence among billions of people and vast, entrenched systems of power. So Iâ€™m setting aside the standard answers in favor of a deeper, more contemplative meditation onÂ the question itself.
So far, whatâ€™s arisen for me have been other questions: What do we really mean by fail? What is a democracy, after all? What other forms might it take? Whatâ€™s important about democracy? If democracy fails, what will we lose? Who precisely would be undertaking this right action anyway?
If you decide to ponder this yourselfâ€”more deeply than a quick responseâ€”let me know, either soon or anytime in 2022. Maybe we can do some of this work together. May all of you have a meaningful year ahead.
I have been thinking about this a lot. The many commentators who are asking this question have left me feeling frightened and asking that same question about what can one person do. I think the fact that our democracy has worked for as long as it has is a testament to the founders who created the structures that have made it work. I canâ€™t think of a form of government that would be preferable, but I welcome the idea of exploring this in a group.
I’m fascinated–and glad–to hear you’ve heard many commentators asking this question. I went back and forth about publishing this post, but in the end I published it because it seems important to give the question as much airtime as possible. Many people seem to already know what they should do, but for the rest of us, maybe the question will be a useful entry point.
I agree with you about the founders and the resiliency of our democracy so far. As for other forms of government, it may be as straightforward as starting with other forms of democracy. My wise father-in-law was fond of noting that nearly every new democracy over the past half century or so has adopted NOT the American form of government, but the parliamentary form. That may be worth exploring on its own.
I spoke on the phone today with a good Canadian friend who said the Canadian’s were looking at us as if they could hardly believe their eyes.
They just don’t get it. I don’t either
Me neither, Sheryl. In fact, the more I study and read about the thinking in the public square these days, the less I get it.