Not so long ago, most of my writing was devoted to dialogue. Dialogue and Donald Trump. Dialogue and the debate over guns. Dialogue and why my website isnâ€™t called Dialogue Venture anymore. A whole book about dialogue.
All of which makes my current approach to dialogue so curiousâ€”and maybe fruitful. For the past year or so, Iâ€™ve hit the pause button on dialogue and everything related to it.
This pause has gone through many iterations. Right now itâ€™s in something like a steady state. Iâ€™m avoiding political conversations with friends and relatives. I have myself on social media brownout, following my beloved hobbies but little else. Iâ€™ve found an inner emotional â€œset pointâ€ for news intake: I keep abreast of current events up to that point and no further.
The reasons for the pause may sound familiar. The shock following the U.S. presidential election last fall. Repeated attemptsâ€”and mostly failuresâ€”to find dialogue partners on the other side of any issue. The viciousness in too many social media messages. The damage to my mental health that all of this wreaks.
Strangely, several things dialogic are occurring even within the pause.
For one thing, I am trying to listen selectivelyâ€”for depth and the ring of truth and the â€œstory behind the story.â€ So my attention is drawn to God, to my deepest self, to the few media I trust to articulate the world to me. I am shunning noise, like the sensationalism and repetition that characterize much of todayâ€™s news (and social) media. I find myself reading books more than tweets. I am writing less and reflecting more.
The medium of all this, where it takes place, is solitude and silence: large stretches of time and space to let the news turn over in my soul. This is a distinctly contemplative approach to dialogueâ€”the way nuns and monks, sages, Zen masters, and their counterparts might practice it. Solitude, silence, prayer, meditation, listening, and then acting in the world are what we do.
Must everyone do it this way? Not at all. After the election last November, a great deal was said and written about the need to stay engaged: to redouble our outreach to the â€œother side,â€ to confront the presidentâ€™s excesses at every turn, to oppose injustice. We need people to do that. Conditions could get very bad very fast without that kind of presence in the public square.
But such activity is not the only response. The pause is no less important. It fosters the depth and perspective that can transform activity into something more soulful. It raises larger, deeper questions than we can get to otherwise. It serves as a corrective against shortsighted or impulsive reactions that inflame and do little else.
We all bring different gifts and character traits to whatever issue comes before us. Why would we assume that only one set of those can generate the â€œproperâ€ response?
So my colleagues in dialogue may engage and mobilize. I pauseâ€”perhaps for weeks, perhaps for years. I cannot imagine Iâ€™m the only one. We need both. More than that, we need every offering of every individual gift to see our species through such dark and difficult times.